Technology has clearly made life simpler and more efficient, and because of this, Neil Postman believes that the consequences of technology have been hard to see. Postman agrees with Swedin and Ferro in that change, from a technological stance, is growing very rapidly. But unlike the two, Postman examines the effects technology is having on society and culture, in particular, the disadvantages of our technology dependence and how our learning abilities are being affected.
Postman does not necessarily dislike technology. He does manage to acknowledge technology’s helpfulness in society, but because of his very radical stance and lack of insight to the positive uses of technology make it hard to agree with him. Postman argues that society must look at the harmful side of technology. We must examine in the burdens and not be so consumed with its benefits, which make it hard to realize the negative impact technology can have on a society.
Postman also explains how technology is altering conception of leaning. He believes that televisions will be the cause of not needing school teachers anymore. This book was written over ten years ago and society has yet to see such drastic and negative changes taking place. One can argue that Postman is being a bit dramatic as well as pessimistic in his predictions for the future. Some things cannot be replaced. He also discusses how the meaning of words and our conception of reality is being changed due to technology. Meanings change as we continuously gain new knowledge. Society is constantly undergoing constant change, and although technology is one of the greatest advances in science, it is certainly not to blame for our changing perceptions and behaviors.
Postman breaks cultures into three types: the tool using culture, technocracies, and technopolies. The tool using culture, defined as those who use tools to solve specific and urgent problems of physical life, or to serve the symbolic world of art, do not let tools change their beliefs, attitudes, traditions, or methods of education (p23). In essence, tools have a very limited effect on a culture. In a technocratic culture, tools play an essential role in the thought-world of culture, though they are not integrated into the culture. Instead, tools attack the culture (p28). Therefore beliefs, traditions, politics and so on must struggle to exist on their own. Technopoly, or totalitarian technocracy, is when the entire society surrenders to technology in return, humans become worth less than their machinery (p52).
Postman basically thinks that there is technology has given us too much information and that there is no way for one person to understand everything there is to know and/or cope with that information. He believes that with the appearance of technology, people will no longer be able to control memory or create meaning from their experiences. Postman assumes that information must be controlled otherwise it is pointless. Postman does not take into consideration that humans can choose what information they seek out and receive. While some information may lack value to some people, it may serve as great importance to others. Individuals may not be able to know everything, but with a communal effort, technology allows us to share what we do know.
Although Postman fails to mention technological advantages, Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology does raise some thought provoking theories about society putting too much trust and dependence in technology. It is interesting to see how these advances are changing culture for the better or the worse.